Finally the game is officially ready! I have spent around 20 hours non stop connecting the scenes together, adjusting transitinos and removing the bugs which I wasn’t attentive enough to spot before. Nothing much happened to document here. It’s just long manual work which is finally over.
A couple of words on sound design. I think that there is no need for many background sounds as title music makes it all to create the right mood. And I think I’ve found the ideal one. It’s light and sad, but gives you a bittresweet feeling. The one that I had when got the message that my friend made it home safe. I was happy that all went well, but at the same time we both were sad that the situation happended and there is more time (unknown amount of time) ahead of waiting till we can meet in person.
I also added simple titles at the very eng just to make the game look finished and deliberately omitted the start screen. I felt it right to make it similar to Journey, which starts right away without explaining anything. I don’t want people feel that it is a game. It’s just a small story which you can experience without getting ready for it.
As a little conclusion so far, this project exhausted me morally and physically (night shifts are becomig a habbit now). But I can’t say enough what a big leap forward for me it was in terms of game design and technical skills. Compared to all my previous games, that had only one simple mechanic and not a hint of narrative whatsoever. Here is the list of things I learned within this project only:
Timeline
Animation triggers
SetActive (true);
Spawning object in order with one button (lists and resourses folder)
Scene transitions
Particle system
Ragdoll mechanics
Sequence puzzle
Pong (and AI)
Custom cursor
Hide cursor command
Close application command
Yes, the game is not 100% polished. Apart from ragdoll, which is still a big issue, I’d work more on background assets and animations. But I can call the game complete and totally satisfied with it. It still has to undergo playtesting ( results of which, I guess, I’ll put in the report mainly) and a bit worried if playtesters understand the story, get the message and in general if they will like the game or not. Because I’ve spent so much effort here. And how will my friend react to it, because it was made due to and partly for him. But this 2 months experience I’m not likely to forget soon.
So I invite everyone to test it out yourselves or watch a walkthrough video below. Have fun and care for your loved ones.
The final mini game is ready! And that means all part of the game are complete and ready for the final set up.
Anothe completely new mechanics for me which I called the sequence puzzle. It turned up quite easy to make. Now I know how to work with string variables, check if the input is in correct order and set up volumes for each puzzle element. That was interesting.
The buttons work fine, it’s just me who couldn’t see properly, where I’m clicking =)
Also as you can see I included particle system ,which I heard of, but didn’t use much before. It was fun playing with its properties.
And again the game required more animation drawing, but I’m happy with the result. By this point I already changed the cursor for a custom one for narrative purposes.
Now I can connect all the parts into one game and hopefully I’ll be done with the project in a couple of days. Can’t wait!
It’s time to learn something new again! For the ball scene I wanted to make the player play with the cat to entertain him a little bit and raise up his spirits. And I had a thought that Pong-like mechanics would fit quite well here. I have spent the whole day following a tutorial, but managed to recreate it successfully. It even has simple AI , which I never thought I’d be capable to implement. But it works and works smoothly. I only have to create additional asset to make the AI paddle look like a cat.
The rest of the scene is also good to go
And I created some more animation for the cut-scene right after this part of the game. Pretty much like it. I never thought I’ll need animation courses I took quite some years ago by this point. But having to work so much with it for this project I can feel the improvement already.
One more mini game to build and I can finally compile all the parts into one game. The ending is near and I’m happy about that, because the work is becoming exhausing. But I want my holidays, so going on.
I’m proceeding well enough with game development. So far I have completed the camp scene and a mini game attached to it. At this poit I’ve beem working very much time with unity animation system, learned to use bools and triggers as well as change sprites on interaction. Who knew that such small interactions with little coding can work quite well, when being compiled in a scene.
Sometimes funny bloopers happen, which give you a good laugh. Especially when you forget to set ridgid body to a kinematic mode =)
Also as you can spot, I’ve learned another new feature which is camera following the character. I can even control the offset borders, which makes it quite handy. It’s a Mario style camera follow when the character is pushing the bounds. I’ve never done that before, but like the result very much. It looks like a real game now.
I also started to set up the first part with the cat just running. Nothing much to show, it’s just running along the snow desert, I’ve just added landscape assets and a trigger to launch the cut-scene with the freight train. Two locations of the second part with cat walking are ready as well. The cat prefab was ready beforehand, so for now I have only one scene to build with mini game and related cut-scene, create one more game for the final part and compile all that together with scene transitions.
We have finally submitted collab project which means I can fully focus on the game. After ragdoll issues I wanted to take it a bit easy and make the parts I’m sure about and which won’t require long hours of coding or setting issues.
Train cutscene went well and smoothly
Shield game works fine too
Though in the shield game I used a familiar mechanics, similar to the one I used in the first game with cats attacking a plant, I added and practiced a new feature for me, which is life count. After bats hit the cat 3 times, the game is relodaded. Player has to keep them away for 30 seconds and the game will proceed.
Other simple cut-scenes such as bus travel was easy as well and doesn’t need much description.
Finally I came up with and updated game scheme and is certain about the connections between scenes and locations.
First of all the game consists of 5 locations, each of them has corresponding symol, mini game and cut-scene attached to it. The game plays with the direction the cat is moving towards in the game. The idea is that at the very beginning we don’t know, where the cat is heading to. On default we assume that he’s going somewhere from starting point to his goal. But as the game proceeds and we see more and more cut-scenes, we realize that locations that we see there are going in reverse order in the game. Which means that the cat is actually not moving forward, but going back.
I’m trying to do a bit of environmental storytelling here as in cut-scenes the locations look more happy and lively (because the cat feels happy in anticipation of a long awaited meeting), while in the game they look more abandoned and lonely to share the disappointed feelings. Especially it will be seen in the camp location as an example.
Arrows in the upper part show my struggles to choose the order of locations. At some point I got lost in them, so that even now I can’t already describe precisely what I was thinking about at the moment and why they ended up in such an order. But this wasn’t the hardest part. The hardest part was to mix and distribute games and cut-scenes along the game. As you can see on the upper scheme, cut-scenes should tell the actual (back)story – the things that happened before the game started and contains character’s motives together with the correct order of locations.
The tricky part was that locations in cut-scenes must appear before the character actually reaches them. Otherwise the player won’t get the “reverse order and going back” thing. So at least one cut-scene needs to be played ahead of the first mini game. Because I initially thought that cut-scenes will be something like a reward for winning and should be related to the actions (or theme) in mini game. In the first part of the game you can see that the first cut-scene (marked in clowdy bubble) will just spawn on trigger without any additional interation. It was needed just to break this initial order and thematic connection between cut-scene and corresponding mini game.
But by doing that I ran into another problem: the reason of mini games being there. I unerstand that initially the games are there just to include some intercation into the story. And with breaking connection between game and cut-scene I have lost the reason of mini games to be present. Untill I came up with the solution that has put all the puzzle pieces together. Instead of connecting them to cut-scenes, I’ll connect them to locations. Since the whole intention of the game is to make the player care for the cat, I’ll adjust the games, so that as the result of playing them, you help the cat to move to another location. For example, in the train location cat spots an open carriage where he stays for some time to rest and sleep. The player in the meantime must scare away bad dreams (bats) to let him rest somehow.
Since I already know the climax scene, I want to create a little plot twist by creating custom cursor in the shape of the sparkle in the ending to hint on that all this time it was us – cat’s friend, who guided and helped him all along the trip.
So having decided all that, I’m fully entering the development step and now it’s more about technical implementation. Some changes are possible, of course, in case I don’t manage to implement something physically.
These days I’m spending most of my work time on creating the minimum amount of assets to continue building the game in Unity. Especially it concerns animations for cut-scenes, which I’m making from scratch. Actually this fact was a major argument for the style, which evolved fron the thumbnails as it was much quicker and easier to animate, bwcause there was no need to deal with outlines, colours and shadows. And overal I found this black&white style very appealing for a lyric and partly philosophical story. A bit later I understood that it’s similar to Limbo, but I use it differently, not in order to create a fearsome and grave atmosphere. Prevailance of white instead of black refers more to light and isolation instead to darkness and unknown, compared to Limbo. From the concept-art point of view we’re more likely to wait for something grim from a dark silhouette rather than a white one.
But coming back to animations, there is not much to say apart from that they take quite a lot of time to make, so I decided that the last climax cut-scene that I’ve finished by this point will have the most animation, whilst the rest of them will be mostly animated in Unity with more or less static images as it’s much faster. This is the example of character animation for the meeting scene.
Thus working on animated scenes is a routine work for me, but for implementing that in Unity I had to get to know the Timeline tool, which I found very useful as it’s possible to control the length and order of animated bits as well as switching from scene to scene without having to create scripts for activating certain objects at the right time. Very handy and this is the second brand new thing to learn about Unity during this project.
I’m still struggling with the complete image of my story and I know I should have finished the concept long ago. Hopefully, when I’m done with the cut-scene, and have no certain areas to work on, the decisions will come faster.
I’ve breen struggling these days with bringing all the ideas and thoughts about the game to some kind of an order. Actually I wasn’t sure about where to start with developing my story. So I started with simple questions which came to my mind, while I was looking at the image, that the player will see for most of the game:
By this point I have already dropped the idea of path choices, because it would be too much work for this project. I still must remain realistic about the deadlines and my work capacity, taking into account we have one more project going and me still having another part-time course. So the game will be very linear with one thing being determined by the other.
After asking myself these questions, I managed to figure out what is the bare minumum of information I have to include in order to produce a complete story. They are “Where is he going?” aka the game goal, and “How did he end up here?” aka the backstory.
Ok, now I need to decide, how to present these parts of story coherently. Almost immediately I thought about cut-scenes, which are a nice way to set a parallel story without messing up the actual gameplay story. So that current events are happenig as the game flows, while bits of backstory are shown in flashbacks.
But at this point I have a problem going on, which is such approach will turn my game into animation actually made in Unity even though player will be able to control the character in one way or another. A very boring walking simulator. So, to include some interaction I’m thinking about incorporating mini games, that will happen, for example, after the character finds a symbolic item. A game will be played and after that a piece of backstory is revealed.
With these thoughts in mind I created the Plan, which helped me get some structure of my future work:
So now we can see that the game is separated into 3 parts depending on the character state. In the beginning the cat is still full of power and is running on his own without player being able to control him. Since it would be boring to just watch the cat running, this part should be relatively short with just, maybe, one mini game. The main part is where the player gets control over the cat with keyboard buttons and has to walk around to find mini games and trigger flashbacks. At this stage the cat is pretty much tired, but still can walk. The further he gets the slower he becomes. Eventually he collapses and final part happens, where the player has to drag the character, making him get to his final destination. I hope that this feature will be able to communicate the filling that only player’s help can bring the cat to his goal.
But with that being said, I still couldn’t see the whole story. Only some parts of it like the final mimigame and cut-scene, following it, which will be the climax of the whole story, that reveals why the cat took this trip, what happened just before the strat of the game, when we see him alone in snow desert, and where is he actually going. That will connect story with the backstory.
By that time I was already uncomfortable that I still have nothing done physically about the game, so even without having all parts of the story thought through, I started working on the parts I was sure enough about. I understand that it’s not the best way to do, because it can end up with these pieces being reworked or cut out eventually. But at least I can set up at least a small piece of prototype and create some assets.
As a warm-up I started with the music mini game, where you have to recreate the melody the cat sings. And I couldn’t think that such a simple task would require me much more time than I expected. About 2 days actually. I did the drag&drop mechanics before, but I ran into the problem of spawning notes in a particular order while clicking the same button. This is where I had to learn about lists and resourses folder. Fortunately, with the help of Zhan, fellow students and a couple of youtube tutorials, I solved the issue and the first mini game was ready.
Music is symbolic, because my friend is a musician, so it’s one of the first things to come to my mind. The notes are also special which are first 4 notes of Lensky arioso from Eugene Onegin opera, which contain phrase “I love you”. Actually this refers to a post, spotted in russian social media from time to time about the strength of education in tzar Russia. The post tells about a girl, who saw these 4 notes in a lock charm of her granddad. When he asked her to guess, what’s encrypted in these notes, she quickly sang them and recognized the arioso and the words “I love you”.
I thought that this would be a clever reference, but quite soon realized that barely anyone will be able to understand the reference, so I eventually changed the song to the current main theme. But the original notes still left and my friend even recorded sounds for them.
Apart from that I made some preparatory work at this stage that is background elements, cat run and walk animations and controls, which I will need later.
Since we are about to make a pitch of our game, I need to develop the idea a little bit to understand myself what I’m about to do. So first of all I need to decide on what I want from this project and set up some key points as well as personal objectives (which I will still need in future for the report).
I have already done my research, which helped me to clarify some concept points. For example, the relation between story and gameplay. That I must find the way to support the narrative with interaction that player is about to perform (I’ll elaborate on that down below). Environmental storytelling will play a significant role in the project as this is one of the main sourses of information and ques in wordless games. I also started thinking about particular game mechanics like choices, so that different choices (for example choose to go to an abandoned village which will lead to some kind of flashback memory or proceed through the snow field and not get that) will lead to different bits of information, to actually affecting the ending, but can bring some amount of replayability as you can see from the list of my inspirations like games from Dark pictures.
My main challendge to overcome here is to compensate lack of game mechanics with visuals and story because I’m still lacking enough coding skills to implement something complicated or completely new for me as I’ll have to spend a lot of time learning the coding itself while project development will stay on halt untill I manage to mage a small game feature. So since I’m making a story – then I’m making a story, not a challenge experience.
Also, following my case study analysis scheme, I made the same analysis for my future game to help me understand, that the features I’m going to implement are there for a reason, but not just because I want to.
Also as you can see, I’m already thinking through the commection between story and gameplay. So that as the game proceeds, the cat will get more and more tired up to the point when the player has to literary drag him further to eventually bring him to the final destination. I believe that playing around with character controlls will be an interesting solution to intertwining gameplay and narrative.
This term is devoted to narrative games in their various forms like autobiographical, political, and philosophical. All these game genres are characterized by prevalence of a narrative element the main function of which is to communicate a message. So, I would like to start the research on the topic from revisiting an abstract from my BA thesis, mentioning the split in approach to narrative analysis of video games:
“Worth mentioning here is the “narrativists vs ludologists” conflict in the area of game studies which significantly influences the choice of approaches to game analysis. In brief, narrativists (Ryan, Jenkins, Simons) tend to treat games as texts or stories, “study them alongside other storytelling media” (Jenkins, 2004) and consequently apply methods of narrative analysis. Ludologists (Juul, Eskelinen, Frasca), on the other hand, accuse narratology of “colonization” (Wesp, 2014) and “want to see the focus shift onto the mechanics of gameplay” (Jenkins, 2004). The debates are very deep and still ongoing, but I find the in-between position of Espen Aarseth (2012) the most appealing one as he calls for approaching the problem from the core structure, that is shared by both games and stories, – the four dimensions: world, objects, agents and events. Aarseth in general presents a narrative theory of games and proves that narrative theory can be used for games not neglecting their special features as a separate medium.”
As I have mentioned in project aims and objectives, I would like to focus on wordless narrative games, therefore I have established several key points to research and apply in the process of artifact production. Apart from general overview of works, devoted to wordless games, the main question I need to answer is what game elements are responsible for “telling a story” and communicating the message to players. I will provide several case studies of silent games to see not only which elements tell the story, but how they do it as well. Eventually I will get some understanding of which way to go and what to keep in mind while working on the wordless game of my own.
Games, obviously, are not the first medium that rejects words to tell a story. Laura McGee (2013) gives a brief retrospective about narrative minimalism in mediums, related to games, from which evolved similar approach to games. First of all, the film medium. Maria Carluccio (2016) also gives overview of that medium in terms of wordless picture books’ research and states that in order to keep the viewer engaged in the story, it must reveal itself gradually and make the viewer constantly ask questions of “why”, “what will happen next” or somehow try to predict future events. [p.67] Same applies to games as they rely on visual sequence as well. Coming back to McGee, she also mentions the fact that games literary started from being very minimalistic in narrative due to their dependence on technological levels, so “plot was kept to a bare minimum if there at all and narrative cues primarily existed to give context”. As technologies progressed wordlessness became an artistic choice as it allows to experience the game in a more deep and personal way. As both McGee (2013) and Gaikward (2014), and many other researchers in interactive storytelling field agree, human imagination works with patterns and does not need many detailed descriptions in order to produce a wholistic image. It prefers to construct meanings from small bits of information and that is what various media, focusing on telling a lot through less, try to work with and make watchers/players have a much more powerful experience.
While trying to narrow down my research to wordless games, I found out that researchers barely touched on the topic. A lot of scholars debate on questions of game narrative in general (like the abovementioned Ryan, Jenkins, Simons, Aarseth), but I managed to find only one definition of a wordless game by Emma Reay (2020) in her analysis of the games like Little nightmares and Inside: “Wordless video games convey narrative meaning, game rules and ludic feedback through visual, audible, haptic, and mechanical signifiers without the use of written text or verbal speech, other than in the extradiegetic game menus or title screens. Additionally, wordless video games don’t convey information via a ‘heads-up display’ (HUD), which is an interface overlaid onto the game world that displays information on score, lives, time etc.” [p. 8]
Due to this issue I had to base my research on related wordless narrative mediums like silent comics and picture books. Here I want to two main outcomes. First one was partly mentioned above – “show, don’t tell” principle. It means that players can reconstruct the narrative only with several correct clues from the author. To elaborate this point Carluccio mentions that creators should “consider, how much they want the viewer to guess at the story and how much they want to ensure the story is communicated clearly” [p. 59] This is important because imagination differs from person to person as well as cultural differences can lead to ambiguity and several various interpretations of the narrative. Because, as she rightfully claims, “there is no guarantee that the story they [creators] intend [to make] will actually be the story the viewer takes away”[p.56]
Second important point is “why silent?” e.g. why does a particular game or narrative doesn’t use text and how does it benefit from that absence? Here I would like to start with the example of The Arrival – a silent picture book/ graphic novel (opinions vary) by Shaun Tan. It is a story about migrating to a completely foreign country and trying to adapt to the new life there. I completely agree with Sly’s (2020) outcome that silence gives us experience of “trauma and alienation as well as silence resulting from people not having a shared language”. Such omnision makes the story “interactable” because together with the character viewers try to learn and understand the rules of a completely unknown world. It is supported even more by peritext, where even we, the ones outside the story, can’t understand a thing as it was designed not to resemble any known language. By excluding the core means of communication we can not only consciously understand that the character is alone and doesn’t understand a thing as if could have read about it but can feel in on our own. So, silence significantly deepens our experience.
But let’s turn to games medium. Games are different from picture book and comics because of direct player’s interaction, game rules and mechanics that provide and control this interaction. So, the effects of silence would be different. I want to take 3 games as examples: Little nightmares 1&2, The Journey and The Flower. Apart from the question “why silent?”, I will define which visual ques (according to Carlussio) they use to communicate narrative and what role gameplay has in this communication.
The Journey:
Why silent? The case of Journey is related to The Arrival. All locations that we visit are vast deserted areas where our protagonist is the only one standing (we omit the multiplayer feature here). Verbal silence intensifies the feeling of loneliness as well as relates to the characters backstory, who turns out to be the last one standing from their civilization. Thus, you may argue that technically there is a form of verbal communication, using square signs and sounds. But it has the same peritext effect as in The Arrival. We as players don’t understand their communication and the meaning of squares. Everything that players really need to understand is depicted with clear images, that form parallel narrative, that eventually forms backstory of the world and produces meaning. If we analyse silence from the point of operational and interpreted components (Schellekens, 2020), wordlessness functions within interpreted ones (the ones that communicate message to player on their own): theme and aesthetics. From the theme of a lonely traveller in a desert and a destroyed civilization silence is a logical element while most of all we as players feel the influence of silence via aesthetics when there’s literary no one to talk to. Even a potential narrator. We have to find out everything on our own.
What visual cues? We can notice 2 types according to Carluccio, which are symbols and title. Thus, they communicate very little narrative information. The majority of it is communicated via environmental storytelling, where in each location we can see the story (picture sequence on walls + story fragment before proceeding to the next one) and its consequences, that is the ruins. By merging two types of information, we understand the main plot.
How gameplay communicates the narrative? Journey has a very simple gameplay. Though it can’t compare with environmental storytelling, core mechanics support emergent narrative. For example, we have to free cloth creatures from fragments of some cages in the beginning. Later on we find more preserved ones, which turn out to be snake-like machines and at some point we meet them alive which try to damage us. So, two mechanics “free the creatures” and “avoid cage-creatures” add to the world story narrative.
The Flower:
Why silent? Silence supports the theme element, which is nature. Most of the game is about the petal wind flying around. Player just does not need any verbal guidance or information. He must feel free and alone, being able to go wherever with a pleasant music in the background. In this game silence is related to aesthetics and game dynamics elements. Especially dynamics, because without any literal instructions at the beginning of the game you do not have particular understanding what to do and where to go. The clues are made only visually, and player must spend some time just flying around and enjoying colourful scenery. What was intended by developers in the first place.
What visual cues? Like in Journey it is possible to distinguish only 2 types – symbols and title. Petals symbolize nature and electric tower symbolize the city. Supported with gameplay it is not hard to get a simple message of nature struggling with the grey city. Again, most of the job does environmental storytelling and how locations transform from colourful and airy to hostile electrified and stiff ones as we approach the city.
How gameplay communicates the narrative? Gameplay can be described in one short phrase: collect petals and avoid electricity. From collision with electric tower players get a clear message that the city destroys nature. But closer to the end, we get another mechanics, which is demolishing the towers, which develops the narrative to communicate the main message.
Little Nightmares 1&2:
Why silent? First of all, I think that it contributes to the genre, which is horror. It is supposed to produce mystery and fear, because silence is like darkness: the unknown is what scares the most. Secondly it works well in combination with the main characters, who are children. Reay (2020) states that from one point it hints on children’s “quiet compliance”, making the player feel like “an anxious parent, protecting a dependent child as it moves through a dangerous world” [p.1] From another point it increases mystery and disturbance, when children become stronger with potentially sinister intentions and they “seem imbued with authoritative knowledge” [p. 12] Silence is needed to influence player’s perception of the story and characters, which means it is directly related to aesthetics element (which is “how it feel to play the game”).
What visual cues? Little Nightmares have more visual cues as it presents humans and human-like creatures that express a big variety of gestures. A significant amount of storytelling goes by symbols, which make players engaged in the process of finding out their meaning. For example, in part 1 the eye that is present in many locations and is even an obstacle at some point. Part 2 is especially rich in symbols, that can help players develop their understanding of narrative. That is the music box of Six, the door that Mono is constantly trying to reach, TV sets all over the game etc. These key symbols make us ask questions and suppose their meaning and role in the story while playing. Players are interested in finishing the game in hope that the meaning will be revealed in the end or at some point of the game. The key engine of Little nightmares is mystery which creates dynamical interest in the narrative. We are in constant state of “what happens next?” For example, in LM2 with each location change we wonder, which one will be next and what monsters are awaiting there; the mysterious Thin Man by giving us small hints first forces us to move further to reveal his origin, which is the climax of the whole game and turns the narrative understanding inside out. Peritext-like elements are also massively present in the game which allow players to have debates over the whole game story. For example, portraits of the characters, that we saw before together with the ones we don’t know makes us ask questions one who they might be. In LM2 children’s chalk drawings giving hints to future or some explanation to the past events etc.
How gameplay communicates the narrative? Basically, the gameplay supports the message of vulnerability of child characters. All we can do is hide and trick monsters. But gameplay changes dramatically together with the story and supports the narrative trick. As children gain powers, they not only start to attack, but player gradually has less and less control over them. Especially it is vivid in the ending scene of LM1, where Six devours souls of everyone around, and player has no control, but to let her move forward.
Outcomes:
– Wordlessness of a game is a tool that must be applied for some particular purpose. Mostly to enhance some kind of feeling and make the experience deeper and more immersive. Depending on the genre, silence can me calm and meditative or disturbing. So when thinking through a project, we must clearly answer the question “what for do I need this silence”.
– Absence of words already communicates a message on the level of aesthetics most of all. It means players can feel something they not always can verbalize. I believe it is a deeper level of interaction with the medium.
– Words or verbal clues are the pieces of the narrative puzzle that can be deliberately omitted in order to stimulate players’ imagination and make them produce meanings by themselves. Alongside core game elements it creates narrative dynamics – the holes, which players’ mind need to close in order to feel comfortable. But important to remember that the main message must be communicated clearly via other elements because there is no guarantee that players will take out the same understanding as developers intended.
– Most of communication in case of wordlessness relies on visual cues. Case studies showed that the most widespread ones are symbols and peritext together with environmental storytelling. Since characters can say nothing, the surroundings will.
– Silence must be supported by gameplay. Characters must demonstrate behaviour and abilities in correspondence with the narrative state they are supposed to be in. Otherwise, the aesthetics will not work properly, and the message is highly probable to be distorted or the narrative will not be engaging enough to keep the player interested.
– In terms of the story, I must clearly think through, what parts of it can be hidden or omitted in order to still keep the main idea clear.
SOURCES:
Carluccio, M., (2016). Wordless Children’s Picture Books: A Universal Language, Fashion Institute of Technology, State University of New York.
Gaikward, K. (2014). Use of a Wordless Narrative in Gaming. Available at: https://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/KaranGaikwad/20140831/216312/Use_of_a_Wordless_Narrative_in_Gaming.php (Accessed: 21.02.2021).
Jenkins, H. (2004) ‘Games design as narrative architecture’ in Wardrip-Fruin, N. and Harrigan, P. (ed.) First person: new media as story, performance and game. Cambridge, Ma.: The MIT Press.
Mcgee, P. A. (2013) Minimalism inGame Narrative: Can we say more bytalking less? Available at: www.dreamfeel.net:http://www.gamasutra.com/blogs/PaulAndrewMcgee/20130517/192492/Minimalism_in_Game_Narrative_Can_we_say_more_by_talking_less.php (Accessed: 20.02.2021)
Reay, E., (2020) Secrets, Stealth, and Survival The Silent Child in the Video Games Little Nightmares and INSIDE. Barnboken, 43.
Sly, C. (2020) An eloquent silence: The value of wordless narratives. Scan, 39(7).
Schellekens, J., Caselli, S., Gualeni, S., Giappone, C. (2020) Satirical Game Design: The case of the Boardgame Construction BOOM!. In In the Proceedings of The International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. FDG.
